This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
Was this a distinct enough war in its own right to justify an article, or should it just be part of the wider article on the Seven Years War? Lord Cornwallis (talk) 20:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Requested move
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: move. The evidence provided seems sufficient to grant the move. -- tariqabjotu 04:31, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it seems that British privateers were already engaging with Spain in 1761 (such as the British East India Company invading Spanish colonies). -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 00:36, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Note this statement from the article: "Furthermore, Spain suffered from attacks by English privateers in Spanish waters, and claimed compensation." This is referring to the period before Spain joined the war. As to the British East India Company invading Spanish colonies, please list an example of that, as I do not know any. King Philip V of Spain (talk) 16:07, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support: It's fairly clear that the consensus among academics is that the war should be called the Anglo-Spanish War of 1762 or should at least acknowledge it lasted from 1762-1763. See here, here, and here. Additionally, the formal war was declared January 4, 1762. Anything that happened in 1761 is prelude, and can still be discussed. Privateering is per se an act of war, but it was not so in the colonial sphere, which saw frequent instances of "officially-condoned piracy", especially during times of peace. Cdtew (talk) 18:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
