Tonkawa Massacre

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've hardly ever read a more confusing and inaccurate description of what plain words of a document mean. This article needs to be rewritten in it's entirety, by someone who studies the history. I'm appalled. Sbalfour (talk) 01:02, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly done, but the article lacks substantive text. At least what's there is concise and accurate. Sbalfour (talk) 02:51, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any definitive source for this name. The "Treaty" referred to wasn't separate, but merely an addendum to the Treaty of Fort Meigs. Ohio History Central uses that name, but nowhere else, and the term doesn't appear in the treaty itself. It wasn't signed at St. Mary's, but at Fort Meigs at the same time. So hmmmm.... Sbalfour (talk) 23:12, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rescinded the name, unless or until someone can cite a primary source to validate Ohio History Central's use of it. Sbalfour (talk) 23:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]