Tonkawa Massacre

Welcome!

Hello, Elop76, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! DS (talk) 14:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Salou ibrahim dailyharrison.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Salou_ibrahim_dailyharrison.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:07, 22 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Marcospaullorbny.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:25, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Solli.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:26, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ballouchy.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:26, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Salou ibrahim dailyharrison.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:26, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but what do you mean by this? Are you Ms Linda Cuttone of Sports Vue Images? BTW, images from dailyharrison.com cannot be used here either, because apparently dailyharrison licenses them under a "non-commercial use only" license, which is not acceptable for us. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There web site says they can be used, but if not I'll delete. Other images from dailyharrison have been used by other authors.

Uhm, no, dailyharrison can't be used, it clearly has a license that isn't "free enough" for us. About the other one, I take it you are saying you are in fact not yourself the creator then, right? (In that case, please don't use the "self" copyright tags in future). Can you give me a link to the actual source page so I can check the license? Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:17, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

here is the site info, http://www.dailyharrison.com/site-information#CC

is it suitable for use?

No, unfortunately not, just as I said earlier. The "noncommercial-only" clause kills it for us. Please see Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Non-free content on why we do not accept such licenses. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Manuel Lucena has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mo ainm~Talk 18:07, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my summaries are often exaggerated, i suffer from a bipolar disorder which more often than not gets the best of me, for stupid reasons that elude me. I offer my sincere apologies, if you don't want to accept them - as MANY have not in the past - nothing more i can do about it.

Attentively, hopefully we can work together if the occasion comes (i doubt if from your reaction) - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 14:59, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Also, as i pointed out to you in my original message, could you point out my grammatical errors so that i correct them? I don't want to come across as an "holier than thou" type, thinking i write better than anyone (but for example, there is no need to write "top flight" with the commas). Thanks - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 15:01, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• • I accept the apology, and would not mind working with you in the future. These was one item on the Piti article I fixed, and many of your corrections of my writing is appreciated. I just wanted to make the articles more current by putting recent content which I have seen that you have corrected, which is fine. Thanks

Elop76

• Many thanks for the understanding man, truly sorry indeed. Are you also this user (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:165.212.191.147)? If so, my apologies to "him" as well :) --Vasco Amaral (talk) 15:29, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there ELOP, VASCO here,

really have no idea on how that picture thing works. I once took a picture from the Spanish wiki in Aitor Ocio - the only time i tried that with pics - put in in the English version and it worked fine. However, the picture in ES.WIKI has been removed.

I also tried some stuff with Roberto Trashorras, it did not work either, as with you. Attentively - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 17:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the topic about Roberto Trashorras, I say you that, already I put the picture in the english, spanish wikipedia and commons attributing the authorship to its owner (in Galician Wiki), regards.Xxxx693 (talk) 06:18, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• This "user", who is so kind in helping you in the sentence above, after a long run-in with me in the Quique Flores page, resorted to all kind of insults towards me, his account is blocked for 48 hours. Another account of him, User:Lombriz de Aguapuerca, has been closed by the administration. Just thought i'd let you know that, cheers - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 16:00, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there ELOP, VASCO here,

please (please!), in player articles it's: full name of teams in storyline/intro, compression in BOX. Thanks.

Attentively, happy week - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 23:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Connor Lade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Yet to play for team and thus fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:NFOOTY.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 05:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In Connor Lade, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page St. John's University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Fernando Cárdenas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Aldo Paniagua, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independencia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elop76. I am making contact with those Editors that take an active interest in Finnish football on English Wikipedia.

For a long time I have been happy to work on Finnish football on Wikipedia without making contact with other Finnish football enthusiasts - basically I like preparing articles / undertaking tasks that interest me and contact with others has not been important. However recently some of my work was changed by a Wikipedia Reviewer and this has led me to question what approach I should be following and indeed what approach would other Finnish football enthusiasts wish to adopt?

The current issue I face is the naming of Finnish Football League and Cup pages. I have adopted the approach that we should always be using the Finnish name in the title, for example 2007 Ykkönen and 2001 Veikkausliiga. However, I am aware that words like Mestaruussarja mean very little to most English speaking Wikipedia users. I therefore have included the English name in the title as well in recent pages, for example, 1936 Mestaruussarja – Finnish League Championship, 1938 Suomensarja – Finnish League Division 2 and 2000 Kakkonen – Finnish League Division 2. I thought that this approach might be a suitable naming convention until the Reviewer changed "2012 Suomen Cup - Finnish Cup" back to 2012 Finnish Cup.

The basic question I am asking is whether Finnish League and Cup articles should have a Finnish or English title or some form of hybrid?

I provide examples below:

Finnish Title English Title Hybrid Title 2012 Veikkausliiga 2012 Finnish Championship 2012 Finnish Veikkausliiga 2012 Kolmonen 2012 Finnish Division 3 2012 Finnish Kolmonen 2012 Suomen Cup 2012 Finnish Cup 2012 Finnish Suomen Cup 2012 Suomen Liigacup 2012 Finnish League Cup 2012 Finnish Liigacup 1938 Maakuntasarja 1938 Finnish Division 3 1938 Finnish Maakuntasarja 1954 Suomensarja 1954 Finnish Division 2 1954 Finnish Suomensarja 1970 II divisioona 1970 Finnish Division 2 1970 Finnish II divisioona 1986 III divisioona 1986 Finnish Division 3 1986 Finnish III divisioona 1997 Ykkönen 1997 Finnish Division 1 1997 Finnish Ykkönen I have read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) and Wikipedia:Article titles but have not reached a firm conclusion yet on the best way forward in establishing a consistent approach. The issue does matter with respect to the corrections I must make to existing pages and the tens of pages yet to be prepared. It could also carry implications for some of the articles that you currently contribute to. I think that the matter would best be addressed on a proper basis and encourage that the issue is considered on the Talk Page of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Finland task force. If the matter is of concern to you as well, please add your name to the list of participants on the main page. You may also wish to comment on the project structure that I have prepared. Kind regards - (Finnish Gas (Finnish Gas 13:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)).[reply] Proposed deletion of Brian Sylvestre The article Brian Sylvestre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] Nomination of Brian Sylvestre for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Sylvestre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Sylvestre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:53, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] Proposed deletion of Ruben Gonzales Jr. The article Ruben Gonzales Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:09, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] Proposed deletion of Marvin Iraheta The article Marvin Iraheta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:56, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] Proposed deletion of Ryan Maduro The article Ryan Maduro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:56, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] Proposed deletion of Spencer Thompson The article Spencer Thompson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] Proposed deletion of Joe Anderson (Canadian soccer) The article Joe Anderson (Canadian soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] Proposed deletion of Jeremy Vuolo The article Jeremy Vuolo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 02:09, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] Proposed deletion of Cordell Cato The article Cordell Cato has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 02:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC) == Jeremy Vuolo has played professional soccer in Finland,why was his page deleted?[reply] Proposed deletion of Emiliano Bonfigli The article Emiliano Bonfigli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 02:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] Nomination of Jeremy Vuolo for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeremy Vuolo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Vuolo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply] Connor Lade - Reply Hi there ELOP, VASCO "here", incredibly, the user/admin who deleted it, User:Fastily, has retired from WP, having grown tired of the overall attitude of the site. Your best bet now is to take it to WP:FOOTY (please see page here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football), lots of people there (including administrators) to help you re-create Lade's page. Cheers, keep it up - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 17:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply] Re: Ryan Maduro Unfortunately, I can't since I'm not an administrator. However, if you speak to Explicit (talk · contribs), the admin who deleted the article in the first place, I'm sure he/she will restore it, provided you provide sources confirming the debut. Cheers. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:23, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] I have restored the article, following your request at REFUND. Please update it and add a reliable source to confirm that he has made his debut. JohnCD (talk) 10:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply] ArbCom elections are now open! Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] ArbCom 2017 election voter message Hello, Elop76. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] Disambiguation link notification for February 26 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Youba Diarra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2nd Bundesliga. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply] Proposed deletion of Ricardo George Hello, Elop76 Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions. I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Ricardo George, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article. If you wish to contest the deletion: Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}} Click the Publish changes button. If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks! (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) JW 1961 Talk 15:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply] Deletion discussion about Ricardo George Hello, Elop76, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions. I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ricardo George, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo George. You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks! (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) JW 1961 Talk 18:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply] Proposed deletion of Javier Velasco The article Javier Velasco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: Footballer and coach who fails GNG and NFOOTY While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 06:38, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply] Revert on Frankie Amaya Is there a reason you re-added the prose the IP added regarding these goals, despite the fact that there is no clear reason for its inclusion? If it is in fact his first match with two goals in his career, then we need a source reflecting that fact and the one that was added back does not reflect that. Otherwise, we shouldn't be cataloging every goal that a player scores. Jay eyem (talk) 13:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply] Would you please respond here regarding this matter? I would rather not hash this out in the edit summaries or talk pages considering these sorts of additions have happened across multiple articles as well. Consensus at WT:FOOTY in the past has made it pretty clear that we should not be detailing out every goal being scored and to focus on significant goals. If it is in fact Amaya's first two goal game, and that can be sourced, there should not be any issue. Jay eyem (talk) 14:34, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply] ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply] Nomination of Ricardo George for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ricardo George is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo George (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Robby.is.on (talk) 21:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]