Battle of Locust Grove

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Geography To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles. Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes Map : See Wikipedia requested maps Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places Stubs : See Geography stubs Limnology and Oceanography Mid‑importance This article is part of the WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the inland waters and marine environments. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on limnology- or oceanography-related topics, as well as to ensure that limnology and oceanography articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.Limnology and OceanographyWikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyTemplate:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyLimnology and Oceanography articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Climate change Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

This is the start of an article on Coastal Erosion Prevention and I would like to talk to others who have a similar interest, and may just have new knowledge in this field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crowsgorve (talk • contribs) 05:05, June 12, 2005‎

Original article was really bad, containing many inaccuracies, poorly researched and explained examples, etc.. Tides are definitely NOT the main cause of coastal erosion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dborignal (talk • contribs) 14:14, December 19, 2005

Definately needs some work- perhaps include some of the causes and cross-reference to costal defenses and methods of avoiding sinking into the sea, like Managed Retreat... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.218.5 (talk • contribs) 17:43, February 6, 2006‎

Ummm...This article is pretty good somone did a really good job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ 69.143.208.177 (talk • contribs) 09:48, May 7, 2007

this is not a good page because it has not enough detail — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ 86.154.147.16 (talk • contribs) 14:39, December 1, 2008

It does not tell you about caves stacks arches stumps an many more things — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.101.240.6 (talk • contribs) 03:11, April 5, 2011‎

I agree,and I researched and came up with another better website (whose name shall remain undisclosed)and found out everything I needed to know. I will not be returning to wikepedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.25.47 (talk • contribs) 13:21, January 16, 2012‎

I dont think its good enough — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.25.47 (talk • contribs) 13:17, January 16, 2012‎

"Beaches are the largest on September 21st, the equinox" In the north... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.228.11.136 (talk • contribs) 00:18, June 11, 2007‎

I have attempted to fix the layout of this page. Not a single user to date has bothered to sign their posts – Please sign your posts by adding "~~~~" at the end of your comment before saving the page. Thanks, Grollτech (talk) 22:14, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone contribute something about the river and stream sediment factor. In California, I've heard for years that flood control and dam projects keep sediment from flowing into bays and oceans thus robbing beaches of a good source of sand. This seems to be evidenced by the fact that many dams are finally back filling with tons of silt and are no longer effective. I'm not an expert in this area so I defer to soil scientists, hydrologists and other hard science people. Me just humble shrink and surfer boy. Kit Hill kithill@aol.com.

In the section Examples "An example of a cliffed coast is in north-south Wales where over years of the sea beating at the cliffs the houses on top have begun collapsing into the sea. With some of them you can even see inside as the entire backs of some of the houses have come off and have been launched over the clifftop that has been torn through by the ferocious sea." north-south wales is incorrect and the grammar used is terrible. It would be better put as 'A place where erosion of a cliffed coast has occurred is at Wamberal in the Central Coast region of New South Wales where houses built on top of the cliffs began to collapse into the sea. This is due to waves causing erosion of the primarily sedimentary material on which the buildings foundations sit.^[1]' Crabs69 (talk) 10:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  06:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Coastal erosion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061211214055/http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/template.cfm?name=resources to http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/template.cfm?name=resources
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070329183950/http://www.fettes.com/caithness/coastal%20erosion.htm to http://www.fettes.com/caithness/coastal%20erosion.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coastal erosion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us/Hazards/protect.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030218074552/http://cse.cosm.sc.edu/erth_sci/Coasts/Erode.htm to http://cse.cosm.sc.edu/erth_sci/Coasts/Erode.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So hydraulic action is "waves compressing air in cracks in a rock shoreline"? Would that not be pneumatic action by definition? Or hydro-pneumatic at best. That seems at odds with every other usage of the word hydraulic that I've ever seen. What would be much more in keeping with every other definition of the word would be waves acting on water which has seeped into cracks in the rocks, since hydraulic hammer effect is a well known phenomenon, and water, being incompressible, is a far, far more effective transmitter of impact force than air, which simply acts as a cushion or spring, without transmitting a shockwave to anything like the same degree.

64.223.124.231 (talk) 23:19, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

rvf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.219.236.254 (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The tracking section is quite short. In my view, the section would benefit from additional explanation how these measurements could be used. We have published a study on this in Coastal Engineering (one of the leading scientific journals in this field). I think, we could contribute some interesting aspects to this paragraph (how to use these tracked profiles and how to use this information for future coastal management). Let me know what you think about these suggestions! Philot789 (talk) 13:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the tracking section was really short compared to the other sections of the article. They only gave a few methods to track coastal erosion in three sentences, when each method could have been expanded on a little more. I think that your idea to include a few paragraphs on future coastal management would also make this article a stronger reference to be used in other work and projects. Lenaerickson (talk) 03:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thank you for your feedback! I will think about some extensions in the next days and propose them Philot789 (talk) 13:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lenaerickson (talk) 03:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]