Battle of Locust Grove

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I would argue that the following wording needs to be reconsidered for the front article

"ISO 20022 is the successor to ISO 15022...."

According to the info at

http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=33179&ICS1=3&ICS2=60&ICS3=&scopelist=

http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=28373&ICS1=3&ICS2=60&ICS3=&scopelist=

the current status of ISO 15022 is not superceded by ISO 20022, rather it was appended by ISO 20022. Otherwise the info at ISO website would be incorrect.

I would reword it as

"ISO 20022 is the standard complementary to ISO 15022"

Or

"ISO 20022 is the appending standard to ISO 15022"

Since I'm unable to obtain these standards, the persons who can access these docs, please verify them.

Those links indicate that ISO 20022 revises ISO 15022. That revision is so complete that it is correct to consider ISO 20022 to be a successor to ISO 15022.

Note that ISO 20022 has not immediately replaced ISO 15022; both will continue to be in use for years to come, but the intention is that there will be no major new work done on ISO 15022 messages; any major new work will be done in ISO 20022, so ISO 15022 should slowly fade away over time.

Abcoates (talk) 21:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since its all about the messagings standardisation, I added a reference to the catalogue of messages at iso20022.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.49.111.94 (talk) 08:20, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the summary and I still do not know how ISO 20022 is used or what it is used for. The summary simply states who it is used by (financial institutions) and that it contains metadata and messages. What are in these messages? What does this metadata describe? For this to be a real encyclopeida article, it has to answer "what is this used for". Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 23:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It does not work from my machine : https://www.euroclear.com/site/publishedFile/ISO_20022_information_note_01102009_tcm91-175221.pdf?title=ISO+20022+-+information+note

Is this link only available if you have a Euroclear account? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.80.22.6 (talk) 17:54, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that Fed Now uses ISO 20022. I heard that 63 central banks announced that they will use ISO 200222, that many financial institutions like SWIFT and DTCC are upgrading to Digital Ledger Technology (DLT), and that there are only 5 DLT tokens that are compliant with ISO 20022. So to be compliant, the Fed and Central banks must use one of these five tokens, including XLM, XDC, Iota, and XRP. They would not use another one because it takes years to develop another token.

Does this sound right? Does the Fed and other central banks de facto have to use one of the 5 tokens to be ISO 20022 compliant? Alternately, are there institutions that are ISO 20022 compliant and don't use one of these 5 tokens? Thanks. Rakovsky (talk) 02:02, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]