Battle of Locust Grove

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States courts and judges This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I do not really see why the Jackson article should contain an at length discussion about the Rehnquist memo. The controversy was about Rehnquist and his attempts at attribution, not about Jackson. This is all discussed in the Rehnquist article.

Yes, the memo was written for Jackson; but then so were hundreds of other memos. The Rehnquist article rightly contains a paragraph long discussion on the memo. While a mention of the controversy and a link to the Rehnquist article might be appropriate, a lengthy discussion (longer than the far more relevant Black-Jackson feud, as it stands now) seems out of place to me. Magidin 17:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the Rehnquist article should discuss it in much greater detail; if you feel you can trim it down appropriately, go ahead, as long as you don't remove it entirely. Postdlf 17:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did this man have a family? Parents, wife, children or something? To me it seems like he came from space without any human relationsips. This whole article is jst about his work. Family facts are sadly not included. 89.51.158.22 09:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The most recent addtiion (June 14 2007) is out of place in the sequence of the article. The cables to Truman are mentioned later on, in their proper chronological place. It should be moved to its proper place, and repeated matters should be removed (e.g., the contents of the cable). In addition, it seems to contain a fair amount of POV comments. Magidin 04:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson's confrontation with the surviving Nazileaders during the international tribunal is curiously absent from this section. The link to the site honoring Jackson is perhaps understandably quiet on the matter, as Hermann Goering seems to have won more points against Jackson than he lost, though of course Goering's debating skill had no effect on the verdict. As written, the Nuremberg section places more emphasis upon Jackson's concern with the vacancy for chief justice back in DC.

Perhaps someone with more knowledge of the subject could expand the section, though not necessarily in the detail shown in the Goering entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.223.172.199 (talk)

This article has been greatly revised since the last time I read it. It is no longer presented in a clear, chronological fashion. Furthermore, it appears to be biased against Justice Black. With the numerous citations and use of ibid, it almost seems like the individual whom revised the article was copying and pasting portions of a research paper. This article needs extensive clean-up to maintain a more neutral standing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.160.140.209 (talk) 20:27, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

I have begun with some tentative reorganization. This was done by deleting most of the research paper that was dumped in here (although the part on Dennis, though it needs to be reworked, may prove useful). We now have only one section each on the feud with Black, and on the Nuremberg trials. --Max power 17:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I find the section "Feud with Black" to be gossipy and overly sympathetic to Jackson's point of view. It diminishes the article. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 23:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References that say things like "Id. at 230." must be changed to be intelligible even if the order of the references is moved around. This is very poor style in a frequently edited encyclopedia, and is officially deprecated. Would someone that actually knows for certain which ref these sources belong to please correct them? See WP:Citing sources for options. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Robert Houghwout Jackson was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 01:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What where the circumstances of the death of Robert H. Jackoson? --41.144.55.198 (talk) 09:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to "disgraced historian" David Irving, he died in a Bordello bed, however his naked body was quickly moved into the back of a Taxi. "Disgraced historian" David Irving stated he confirmed the source via Jacksons son. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.69.87.97 (talk) 19:28, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Irving's a nut case and not a Reliable Source. HammerFilmFan (talk) 11:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Robert H. Jackson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130626172414/http://www.gsa.gov/buffalocourthouse to http://www.gsa.gov/buffalocourthouse
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0062612/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence "He passed the New York bar examination in 1913 at the age of twenty-one, and then joined a law practice in Jamestown." has a citation that only gives evidence for being on the bar in 1913 and for joining the law practice in Jamestown. There is no information about passing the bar exam. In the opening, it is stated that "He was admitted to the bar via the older tradition of reading law under an established lawyer". Thus, he did not need to pass the bar exam to join the bar. I have added citation needed tags to both of these statements, because they may be contradictory with each other, and neither is cited. 107.196.29.81 (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After a bit of reading it has been clarified that reading the law counts as passing the bar. Now I understand. 107.196.29.81 (talk) 14:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]