Battle of Locust Grove

Welcome to Wikipedia, Aurjansan! I'm I dream of horses, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 16:08, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I moved your recent article to draft space by giving a valid edit summary. Please check and improve if you're interested. Please let me know if you have any questions and I'll be happy to answer them. Happy editing! :-) Maliner (talk) 14:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Meghwal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 19:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chhapola. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
The article was moved to Draft:Chhapola because it was clearly not ready for mainspace, but you returned it without any improvements - Arjayay (talk) 19:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article was moved to Draft:Chhapola because it was clearly not ready for mainspace, but you returned it without any improvements

That's more of an issue of not knowing better, not lack of good faith. I'm not saying that any of the other edits are good-faith, just that there's a valid if concerning explanation for this one. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 20:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Chhapola was moved to Chhapola after improvement ( citation, information, source ). I don't seen any other reason to moved this page again to Draft. now please explain what's wrong with it according to you ? Aurjansan (talk) 03:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping for @Arjayay I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 05:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hloooo aurjansan Zaddy007 (talk) 05:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that a message you recently left to Insightentertain may have been unduly harsh. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see others making a common mistake, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It takes more time, but it helps us retain new editors. Thank you.

In particular, I would encourage you to look at the existing templates we have for warning users; there are multiple levels, which allows us to start out by gently pointing out people's mistakes, and only escalating to threatening to block them if they persist. Immediately threatening a block on the first go is really only for very obvious and/or egregious cases of bad-faith editing. Thanks. --AntiDionysius (talk) 19:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay i will surely consider and follow your point for the next time. Thank you for the warm guidance —aurjansan. Aurjansan (talk) 04:54, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Meghwal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Meghwal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aurjansan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Khatri that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 11:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]