Battle of Old Fort Wayne

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Old West / Civil War / Military history / History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject American Old West (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - American Civil War task force. This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history. International relations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: European / French / North America / United States / American Civil War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  European military history task force French military history task force North American military history task force United States military history task force American Civil War task force Former countries This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles Colonialism (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Colonialism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ColonialismWikipedia:WikiProject ColonialismTemplate:WikiProject Colonial EmpiresColonialism articles Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject United States History To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs Other : Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess: {{WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}} {{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}} African diaspora Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following 2 sections were removed from this article:

1) "Despite Napoleon III's territorial ambitions in Mexico, the French government never recognized the Confederacy and remained officially neutral throughout the conflict."

Can anyone tell me why this was removed? Neither France nor England ever recognized the Confederacy. This is a fact. Does anyone have any source that shows that shows otherwise - that Napoleon III officially recognized the Confederate States of America as a nation? If so, show us. If not, this information should be included in this article and I will put it back in.

2) "In keeping with its official neutrality, the French government blocked the sale of the ironclad CSS Stonewall prior to delivery to the Confederacy in February 1864 and resold this ship to the Royal Danish Navy as the Stærkodder. The ship left Bordeaux on its shakedown cruise with a Danish crew in June 1864. However, the Danish refused to accept the ship due to price disagrements with the shipbuilder L'Arman^[1] and L'arman subsequently secretly resold the ship by January 1865 to the Confederacy while still at sea."

This information is true, has credible sources cited, and is definitely relevant to this article because sales of major weapon systems (such as ships) are always major issues in wartime international relations - which is what exactly the topic of this article (French and US interactions and relations during the American Civil War). Does anyone have a legitimate reason for this section's removal? If so, please speak up.

Because 1) repeated information in the article, if you read it closely enough. 2) should probably go back in. --MacRusgail (talk) 11:14, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- OK. I will put 2) back in. About 1), the article (as currently worded) says that France "hesitated between a neutral attitude, a mediation or recognition of the Confederate States of America." This means that the article says that France was neutral at some times and recognized the Confederacy at other times - which is definitely not true. This oscillation between neutrality and recognition is not the same as stating that France never recognized the Confederacy and was officially neutral throughout the war (which is what actually happened, in spite of Napoleon's ambitions in Mexico and elsewhere).

Also, France's position in this war was very similar to that of Great Britain (maintaining a cautious official neutrality and withholding diplomatic recognition of the Confederacy despite some British and French individuals and groups having interests that could favor the Confederacy). The "Britain in the American Civil War" wikiarticle correctly opens with the following sentence: "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland was officially neutral in the American Civil War." Why not the same with this article? It's equally true for both countries. As always, constructive comments are welcome. Thanks.

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bahamas in the American Civil War which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on France and the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131020162723/http://dig.lib.niu.edu/ISHS/ishs-1991autumn/ishs-1991autumn177.pdf to http://dig.lib.niu.edu/ISHS/ishs-1991autumn/ishs-1991autumn177.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emperor Napoleon III was interested in Central America for trade and plans of a transoceanic canal.

Don't you mean 'cable'? Valetude (talk) 13:35, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two of your three pictures do not relate to anything in the article. Valetude (talk) 00:11, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]