Battle of Old Fort Wayne

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Latter Day Saint movement Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

If Larsen is "a decedent of Joseph Smith," doesn't that mean he's dead? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B011:715B:406D:504A:3417:A71A (talk) 22:51, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is captioned: The headquarters of the Remnant Church as seen Community of Christ's temple. I'm confused. Is this supposed to mean "as seen *from* Community of Christ's temple." ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.40.69.13 (talk • contribs) 23:23, December 6, 2005 (UTC)

Yes, that would be correct. --Blainster 22:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the website and saw that they MISSPELL half the stuff in it.

@Bryan.millet: As I noted in my edit summaries, there are multiple issues with your recent edits ([1]), not the least of which is that they do not adhere to WP:NPOV. For example, we cannot say in wikipedia's voice that Joseph Smith "restored" the church, which would violate NPOV. We can say he organized it, which is NPOV and verifiable, and this is the pattern that we follow because of NPOV on all the other churches in the Latter Day Saint movement. Also, your edit on "restored doctrine" is similarly problematic. It could be more NPOV by changing "revealed doctrine" to "their interpretation of scripture", and I will try making that change here shortly. With regards to the redlinks for Terry W. Patience, it would be a lot easier if we had multiple independent sources, meaning non-church sources, about him to establish his notability. It would also be a lot easier if another editor had not recreated the article multiple times despite the deletion discussion, the response to which is that the article cannot be created now without significant bureaucratic efforts. Per WP:BRD, please self-revert and discuss here on the talk page so that a consensus can be reached before re-inserting the challenged edits. --FyzixFighter (talk) 13:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]