Battle of Honey Springs

Add links

The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) is a gun rights organization in the United States, which aims to advance gun rights in the United States via legal action, in keeping with its stated goal to "restore the essential right to keep and bear arms in the United States."[3] The FPC seeks to approach gun rights advocacy in a more targeted and effective way than the National Rifle Association (NRA),[4] specifically by working with targeted legal teams to advance legislation in support of gun rights causes.[5][6]

California governor Gavin Newsom has described the FPC as "California's leading pro-gun group."[7]

History

The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Sacramento, California. It has been labeled by the Washington Examiner as one of, "the new 'pro-gun rights organization[s]'..." that began to spring up around 2012-2013, as the power of the NRA began to change and as new calls for gun control legislation arose after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in 2012.[4]

Brandon Combs is the president of the FPC.[8]

Activities

The Firearms Policy Coalition is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization. Its legal team, FPC Law, bills itself as, "...the nation's first and largest public interest legal team focused on the right to keep and bear arms," and states that "the primary objective of our legal action programs is to bring cases that protect your rights and property, restore individual liberty, and help us achieve our purpose to create a world of maximal individual liberty."[9]

The FPC has worked on several high-profile federal gun-rights cases in the early 2020s and frequently works with other gun rights advocacy organizations such as, Gun Owners of America (GOA) and the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF).[10][11][12] The FPC was an unsuccessful co-appellant in VanDerStok v. Garland, a 2023 Supreme Court case about whether a kit to make a privately-made firearm is legally itself a firearm.[13][14][5] FPC is also a co-litigant in Mock v. Garland, a lawsuit related to the legality of pistol braces.[6] As of 2023, the 5th circuit court of appeals had granted an injunction in favor of the FPC's position and remanded the case to the district court for further consideration.[15][16][17] An injunction from the district court specifically exempted FPC members from the ban while the litigation was ongoing.[18]

The FPC has also carried out extensive litigation related to state gun laws. Gun laws passed while Gavin Newsom was governor of California that further restricted when and where a legal gun owner could carry or possess firearms was challenged in 2023 by FPC stating, "...that in the now stated 'sensitive' areas it is unconstitutional to take away the firearms of law-abiding citizens residing in the identified zones."[19] In 2023, the FPC sued the state of Oregon regarding a gun law called Measure 114.[20] After the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen ("Bruen decision"), the FPC has been active in bringing lawsuits against state governments that have failed to follow the guidance put forth by the Supreme Court Bruen decision.[21]

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Adam Kraut, then director of legal strategy at the FPC became involved in litigation over the mandatory closure by state and local governments of businesses, and in particular gun stores, not deemed essential.[22]

In addition to advocating for less restrictions on gun ownership in the United States, the FPC also states in its mission that it works to lessen restrictions on "blades" as well as "Other defensive arms," and has been involved in civil liberties litigation in areas adjacent to firearms policy but unrelated to the second amendment itself.[23] The FPC has raised first amendment issues on behalf of a high-school student wearing an FPC patch depicting a rifle, who was instructed by school administration to remove the patch, and has been noted for its opposition to delegating law enforcement powers to private citizens in the fear that those powers would be used to target gun ownership.[24][3]

Funding

The FPC is primarily funded by numerous small individual donors,[25] but does receive some larger gifts from corporate sponsors, including members of the gun manufacturing industry such as Henry Repeating Arms, which made a donation to the FPC of $25,000 in 2023.[26][27]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Firearms Policy Coalition - Nonprofit Explorer". May 9, 2013.
  2. ^ "Firearms Policy Coalition - Nonprofit Explorer". May 9, 2013.
  3. ^ a b "About FPC". Firearms Policy Coalition. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
  4. ^ a b Braswell, Molly C. (February 4, 2013). "New Firearms Policy Coalition aims to get young people in gun rights advocacy". Washington Examiner. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  5. ^ a b Fletcher, Wayne (November 22, 2023). "What is the Firearms Policy Coalition?". TheGunZone. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
  6. ^ a b "Firearms Policy Coalition". Ballotpedia. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
  7. ^ "ENDING GUN VIOLENCE IN AMERICA: What They Are Saying About Governor Newsom's Historic 28th Amendment Proposal". California Governor. June 12, 2023. Retrieved 2024-01-14.
  8. ^ Morgan, Ryan (June 5, 2021). "Fed. judge rules California's AR-15 'assault weapons' ban unconstitutional". American Military News. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  9. ^ "FPCLaw.org - FPC Law Legal Action". Firearms Policy Coalition. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
  10. ^ "US court prevents California from banning guns in most public places". Deccan Herald. Reuters. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  11. ^ Raymond, Nate (January 2, 2024). "US appeals court allows California to bar guns in most public places". Reuters. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  12. ^ Stockler, Asher (December 21, 2019). "Gun-Rights Group Sues Pennsylvania Over New 'Ghost Guns' Rule". Newsweek. Retrieved 2024-01-12.
  13. ^ IV, Antonio Pequeño. "Supreme Court Restores Biden's 'Ghost Gun' Regulations In 5-4 Ruling". Forbes. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
  14. ^ Tuccille, J. D. (November 13, 2023). "Gun hobbyists (and liberty) win big in court". Reason.com. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  15. ^ "Appeals court ruling deals legal setback to Biden administration in gun stabilizing brace case". AP News. May 23, 2023. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
  16. ^ "Mock v. Garland".
  17. ^ "Litigation Highlight: Split Fifth Circuit Panel Renews Injunction Against ATF's Stabilizing Brace Rule". Duke Center for Firearms Law. Retrieved 2024-01-14.
  18. ^ Pierson, Brendan (August 1, 2023). "US pistol brace rule likely illegal, federal appeals court rules". Reuters. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
  19. ^ Imburgia, Ava. "New gun laws aim to positively impact communities statewide". The Channels. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
  20. ^ Botkin, Ben (July 17, 2023). "Gun rights groups plan to appeal federal judge's decision upholding Oregon gun safety law". Oregon Capital Chronicle. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
  21. ^ Sullum, Jacob (November 23, 2022). "Two federal judges say New York's presumptive prohibition of guns on private property is unconstitutional". Reason.com. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  22. ^ Fischler, Jacob (April 23, 2020). "COVID-19 pandemic fuels state feuds over gun rights". Arizona Mirror. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  23. ^ "Firearms Policy Coalition Fund Raising Program". Big Tex Ordnance. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  24. ^ "FIRE on the School Restricting "Dont Tread on Me" and Firearms Policy Coalition Patches". Reason.com. September 1, 2023. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
  25. ^ Maccar, David (April 26, 2022). "Firearms Policy Coalition: On the Front Lines of the 2A Battlefield". Free Range American. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
  26. ^ Arms, Henry Repeating. "Henry Repeating Arms Donates $75,000 to Leading Gun Rights Organizations". www.prnewswire.com (Press release). Retrieved 2023-12-21.
  27. ^ "Firearms Policy Coalition". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2024-01-09.

External links

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearms_Policy_Coalition