Battle of Honey Springs

	This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Should we remove the part about the unofficial flash anim for the song, since its just advertising Newgrounds and Albino Blacksheep. (its on any major video site, GV or YT or whatever. --Joooeeeelllll 03:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changed a few minor details in the plot, a few minor mistakes... Billvoltage

I removed the link to a webcomic, simply because it looked like someone plugging their own work, which is not what Wikipedia is about.Taylor 05:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Made a slight change to the summary... it said "the plane's engines burned out" when the song seems to say that only "three of the engines burned out". Should it be mentioned that in Albuquerque "the towels are oh so fluffy"? Geh heh heh (talk) 02:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed someone's personal website as a violation of WP:EL (self-promotion and advertising) and am considering instead a link to http://www.alsongs.com. Thoughts? RadioKirk (u|t|c) 17:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You know, with such a summary, maybe it would save space you just list the whole lyrics. :) Or does that violate copyrights? RagingR2 10:38, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

South Park episode summaries don't list the script; neither should we list the lyrics. Wikipedia is also not the place for lyrics posting; there are lyrics websites for that. More importantly, there is a humorous quality in seriously describing nonsense (especially in an encyclopedia); thus, I propose we detail the song's story as seriously and professionally as possible. -- Newagelink (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Didn't I say something about this awhile ago? Anyway, I'm in favor of this, since the "summary" is basically a rephrase of the lyrics. I beleive this is the situation with a great number of Al songs. If we're going to summarize, we should do it right, or just give the lyrics? (Frazz 16:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I agree with you guys. The previous summary was nothing more than a paraphrasing of the lyrics. If you tried to post the lyrics on the site, you could end up in trouble for copyrights. The only sites that can post lyrics are all of those lyric sites. The summary now is much better. Sigmund1989 ^{Talk to Me} 11:02 A.M., 30 April 2007 (PDT)

SORRY! You're all wrong. its 2 AM and im bored so i counted all the words. The summary is, in fact, shorter. HEHE! --Joooeeeelllll 06:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This summary needs some cleanup. It's too similar to the lyrics as it is. --Temporarily Insane (talk) 21:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should it be noted that it "technically" may not be the longest song by Al? On the album version of "You Don't Love Me Anymore" it actually lasts 14+ minutes, though not entirely filled with audio. SpellingD 23:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, technically it is. You Don't Love Me Anymore is 14 minutes because it has "Bite Me" on it. If you count the two song separate, Albuquerque is his longest song ever. --BlooWilt 22:43, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Albuquerque" should only loosely be considered a song.

That's a very incorrect statement. Even though the song is not sung (but rather narrated), it is still a song (as in a piece of music). I el-deeted it.203.87.119.103 02:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Way to go, Mr. 203.87.119.103! Thanks for your contribution. --Joooeeeelllll 06:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it says that the song clocks at 11:25 adding up to 27 when he never uses 27s. But this can be disputed. i have the song and iTunes times it up at 11:23. as does Windows Media Player. Also, one line says, quote, "The Movie, which is an unofficial video for the song." What the heck?? I guess someone forgot to finish their thought or just had a typo.

--Joooeeeelllll 06:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

11:25 does not particularly add up to 27. One could easily add 1+1+2+5 to get 9, 11+25 to get 36, or 11+2+5 to get 18. I'm sure many such instances can occur with many numbers, depending on which ones you decide to string together and which ones to add. Yelling Bird 16:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

how many molecules ARE there in Leonard Nimoy's butt?? --Joooeeeelllll 03:02, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who knows? I don't think Leonard Nimoy himself knows. --BlooWilt 00:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How did they calculate exactly how many molecules were in Leonard Nimoy's butt to figure out who the winner was? ~ Wikipedian19265478 (talk) 02:17, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Weirdalrunningwithscissors.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will be merging several articles for individual songs in the upcoming days. This article will be merged with the article for Running with Scissors due to lack of meaningful content and notability required for a separate page.Spman (talk) 03:55, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have always wondered if the inspiration for the music for this song came from The Rugburns' song "Dick's Automotive". They sound very similar. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMtkgWarGTg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.194.66.108 (talk) 16:19, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-Wait I was just listening to Frank Zappa's Don't Eat the Yellow Snow and it sounds very similar, the way it's a long winded story. Also Frank says Great googily moogily! --24.94.251.190 (talk) 04:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Emo Philips is a good friend of Al's. Emo regularly does long-winded stories which are full of weird twists. A staple in Emo's stories is the use of sauerkraut. Emo has a joke about being raised in the basement and being kept there with leather straps. Much of the song is easily traced back to Emo's comedy - with the clear exception of the donut shop routine, which is lifted from Monty Python's cheese shop sketch. So, while the idea of a long meandering song may be inspired by other musicians, the humor is, in my opinion, inspired heavily by Emo. -- kainaw™ 15:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure all of those sound reasonable (to me, it's obvious that Dick's Automotive is a directly similar song)...but none of them can be in the article unless we have reliable sources stating what Yankovic's inspiration was. Anything else would be original research. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:32, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Albuquerque (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070113213921/http://www.weirdal.com/aaarchive.htm to http://www.weirdal.com/aaarchive.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071103114802/http://doggrinnit.typepad.com/bluebeaverbeer/2007/07/index.html to http://doggrinnit.typepad.com/bluebeaverbeer/2007/07/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]