Battle of Honey Springs

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Writing systems High‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Mesoamerica (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles Mexico Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Indigenous peoples of the Americas Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Indigenous peoples of North America This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The introduction at the top of the article should explain why Aztec writing is important, ie how widely it was used, examples of famous texts, etc.

More could be mentioned on what examples of the writing exists, how well current scholars understand the writing system, if they wrote on clay, paper, etc. The description of the signs is good, but there are a lot of context around the signs that should be explained.

Liuyuan Chen 15:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, you did a significant amount of editing with a good degree of quality. In terms of further improvements, I would expand on the origin, musical, numerical as well as the historical components of the page.

ZiTee 2:36, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

The very first assertion made is that Aztec writing is/was pictographic and ideographic. But in the source given for this fact (Lacadena, Alfanso. "Regional Scribal Traditions: Methodological Implications for th Decipherment of Nahuatl Writing") I cannot find anything that says Aztec writing was either of these. In fact, the source seems to be trying to make a case for Aztec writing to be logographic and/or phonetic (page 24, right column). I'm not convinced that this is settled science in either direction. I have heard anthropology professors refer to Aztec writing as primarily pictographic and ideographic, so I'm inclined to believe that is the current wisdom on the topic, but if so, the given source doesn't seem to support it very well. Is there another source that better reflects this? 155.97.15.115 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]