Battle of Honey Springs

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force American Civil War task force Equine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Note that Buford, although fighting dismounted as did mounted infantry, followed standard cavalry procedures and formations (videttes, skirmish lines with cavalry spacing, etc.). The article implies that he used mounted infantry tactics, which involved standard infantry formations (often with massed troops in double rank) and the usage of rifles. Perhaps, the best example of mounted infantry tactics at Gettysburg was Jenkins' brigade on East Cavalry Field. Scott Mingus 12:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and make your proposed changes, but I'd recommend that you choose a famous example, rather than assuming Gettysburg is the operative point in this example. I doubt that many readers of this article would have any familiarity with Jenkins. Hal Jespersen 18:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a sentence that had a citation request:

Under typical conditions on the march, cavalry could cover 35 miles (56 km) in an eight-hour day.

I originally wrote this article based in no small part on notes I took at a 2005 cavalry seminar at the Civil War Institute at Gettysburg College. I have been unable to find a printed secondary source for a citation, so I have removed the sentence until someone can find one. Hal Jespersen (talk) 21:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cavalry in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080312042349/http://www.usregulars.com/Cooke.htm to http://www.usregulars.com/Cooke.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Under ‘Confederate Cavalry’, you say: Furthermore, Southern society was more stratified, which made the soldiers more accustomed to a hierarchy of command and were generally considered more suited to the martial lifestyle. That seems to reflect the Southern military spirit in general, not specifically cavalrymen.

I might suggest instead: Southern society was more rural, with the young men more naturally accustomed to the riding and shooting life. Valetude (talk) 19:33, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]