Battle of Honey Springs

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Russia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 18 March 2019.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Why the article states the year as 1944? Please change it to 1943.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.8.135 (talk) 13:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Deportation of the Kalmyks/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K.e.coffman (talk · contribs) 00:48, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this article; will start on it shortly. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:48, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks to be in great shape. I have one comment before doing the formal review. The sentence "The Kalmyks spoke a Mongolian dialect and practiced Lamaism, a form of Buddhism that is also practiced in Tibet" needs a citation. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:47, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I don't know why, but the sentence was split into two paragraphs during copy edit. Originally, it was one paragraph. Fixed.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Crimes against humanity is a specific legal concept. In order to be included in the category, the event (s) must have been prosecuted as a crime against humanity, or at a bare minimum be described as such by most reliable sources. Most of the articles that were formerly in this category did not mention crimes against humanity at all, and the inclusion of the category was purely original research. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]