Battle of Honey Springs

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Greece Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Numismatics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. European Union Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

•  Done Wikilink
•  Done Wikilink back
•  Done Copy/edit
•  Done Add market prices
•  Done References need formatting... all internet sources need publishers and accessdates. Look at WP:CITE/ES.
•  Done Use Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Belgium) leading introduction, but change it accordingly.
•  Done Add the summary like in the previous article, change the white cells to "-"
•  Done Per WP:HEAD, "Market Value" should be "Market value"
•  Done WP:MOS#Foreign terms says foreign terms not in common English usage should be itallicised. Like Bois du Cazier for example.
•  Done "Issued: 16.10.2002" violates MOS:NUM#Dates ... change these dates!
•  Done Wikilink effigy & GDP if used
•  Done Link to Obverse and reverse only on the first issue of every section
•  Done What is "Proof" "BU" ... wikilink them.
•  Done Change all dates in the texts to day month year format instead of the month day, year
•  Done Remove spaces between references and text.
•  Done consider the {{convert}} template for us imperial measurement fans, for both diameter and mass.
•  Done obverse and reverse should not be followed by side.
•  Done Eurozone is capitalised but euro is not.
•  Done no apostrophes in the names of decades—the correct form is "the 1950s"
•  Done use straight apostrophes and quotation marks instead of curly
• Add texts if vissible in the coin with the translation
•  Done Market value ... fix the market values to ranges (35-40[1][2] instead of 35[1] 40[2]) No issue value for these coins
•  Done De-link the dates
•  Done en-dash in tange of years (like 2000–2002 instead of 2000-2002)

As requested I had a look at the page and my first comments would be: I noticed that some of the photos are slightly out of focus. For example:

20 Euro (2003) - Obv 100 Euro (2004) - Obv All the Obvs of 10 Euros (2004)

also The titles: Mount Pinder National Park - Birds and Flowers[31] Mount Pinder National Park - Black Pine Trees[31]

Should be Mount Pindos National Park - Birds and Flowers[31] Mount Pindos National Park - Black Pine Trees[31]

I'll have a closer look at some later point, but right now I am really nackered!

(Getas75 (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Hi Getas75,

Thanks for your opinion, I do not remember why, but somehow I thought you might be interested in seeing this article, so I am glad you came back. I have changed some images for high resolution ones, but I do not find them all. Do you know of any source that have higher resolution images for the Olympic coins?

Thanks again, Miguel.mateo (talk) 01:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

A recent editor changed some names of some sections, saying that this is what WP:MOS recommends. I want to know what the others feel about it, since if this is the case we should change all articles. My opinion is, since Belgium went through the WP:FL process and passed without these recent changes, I do not see the need to get them done, but I have nothing against them either. I just think it is important to have consistency across all articles.

Thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 01:36, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the recent editor is willing to change them all then I am not against the change otherwise I think we should just revert them for consistency Kevin hipwell (talk) 11:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted after waiting for more than a week with no response. Thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 04:32, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Greece). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080216191618/http://ec.europa.eu:80/economy_finance/the_euro/notes_coins8787_en.htm to http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/the_euro/notes_coins8787_en.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]