Battle of Honey Springs

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Idaho Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Idaho (assessed as High-importance). Politics: American / Political parties Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance). Organizations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've removed a long quote from the party's platform. It is poorly formatted (lacks quotations marks, random external link in section header), primary sourced, excessively long, promotional, and vague. It basically tells the reader nothing. If we want to include text about the party's stances, we should use secondary sources to give context, show noteworthiness, etc. See also Wikipedia:Avoid mission statements. Neutrality^talk 01:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

new wiki contributor here: the chart for State Senators is far out of date, but i am not confident enough to straight up delete it.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Lizard Person (talk • contribs) 19:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A better one would be "Center-right to Right wing" WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 02:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree the current chair is far right and their last lieutenant governor was far right. It is right wing to far right. Zman19964 (talk) 00:46, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And what makes you say that? Because you "feel" that way? Unless the Idaho Republican Party's official position is that they are far-right, it shouldn't be included in the article as it's an unfair representation of the party in general. Norge17maii (talk) 21:12, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You personally deleted an entire well-sourced section of the article that described how frequently they are described as having a far-right faction, with several elected members of the party being affiliated in an official capacity with unambiguously far-right organizations like the Oath Keepers and the John Birch Society whose Wikipedia pages contain that ideological marker. It’s disingenuous to pretend that this is a feelings-based addition to the article. Witchhouseki (talk) 23:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the COI tag on this page? I see it is from 9/2018 and wondering if it still applicable. Thanks! Grahaml35 (talk) 18:55, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]