Battle of Honey Springs

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Indigenous peoples of North America This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Archaeology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Historic sites Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. National Register of Historic Places High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Illinois Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page duplicates material from http://www.kincaidmounds.com and from the Mississippian culture article. While Kincaid is an important site, and the materials in the present version are good, the text cannot duplicate copyrighted website or other Wikipedia articles. I am addressing this mostly to Heironymous Rowe, who I see is a new editor, and may not be aware of these rules. I will edit this soon if you do not make the changes. TriNotch (talk) 07:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reduced the precision of the site's coordinates to no greater than one second per the Manual of Style. Per the size of this object, the coordinates should use less precision. One second equals approximately 101 feet, which is more than enough precision for this site. Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Geographical coordinates and Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#Precision. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 20:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Lapham, Heather A. (2010). "A Baumer Phase Dog Burial from the Kincaid Site in Southern Illinois". Illinois Archaeology. 22 (2). Illinois Archaeology Survey: 437–463. Heiro 04:18, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The era style has been stable on this article for well over 5 years. Now an new account SPA (only edits so far are same as this) is seeking to change it back to its original style. Is there a consensus amongst the editors of this article for a date style, the stable version or the original style last used over 5 years ago? Similar arguments have been made Talk:Cahokia#Date Style and Talk:Native Americans in the United States/Archive 4#Date Style, so a consensus for keeping a stable version has precedence. Heiro 02:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 19#Cahokia for a similar discussion. Heiro 03:47, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with continued use of the CE-era style, especially given its stability.Parkwells (talk) 03:06, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. WP:ERA clearly says "Do not change the established era style in an article unless there are reasons specific to its content.". Dougweller (talk) 05:20, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kincaid Mounds State Historic Site. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080707003643/http://www.siu.edu/%7Ecai/About_Kincaid_Mounds.pdf to http://www.siu.edu/%7Ecai/About_Kincaid_Mounds.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:28, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kincaid Mounds State Historic Site. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080103060508/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=215&ResourceType=Site to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=215&ResourceType=Site
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.siu.edu/~cai/About_Kincaid_Mounds.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]