Battle of Honey Springs

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

United States: Government Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance). Religion: Interfaith Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive. Christianity: Latter Day Saints Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement (assessed as Low-importance). Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: American Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

• https://www.christianpost.com/news/atheist-group-demands-pelosi-drop-prayer-from-jan-6-vigil.html

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 14:35, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An internal link to "The Satanic Temple" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Satanic_Temple should be included. They have brought 8 constitutional lawsuits on this subject in the past few years... see https://thesatanictemple.com/pages/legal-action for details 2603:8000:9D00:694F:C9F5:83DA:28EA:9E48 (talk) 03:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I’m looking to add a section about the debate of the motto “In God We Trust” in the context of separation of Church and State under the “Interpretive Controversies” section of this article. The exactly size of the subsection is unknown at the moment, but it will probably be about 5-10 paragraphs. Does anyone feel that this doesn’t belong and I should edit another Wiki article, or is this okay? Thank you! 172.99.58.62 (talk) 20:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think that it belongs but IMO that 5-10 paragraph range includes possibilities that are too large. North8000 (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the section on modern interpretation, neutrality is particularly critical. It might be better to fold this in with the article on Accommodationism. Or this could be revised for a more concise overview of the specific issues in recent cases and debate on the disestablishment principle and free exercise principle. Eikko (talk) 20:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://archive.org/details/MaxWeberEconomyAndSociety (talk) 20:28, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]