Battle of Honey Springs

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Oklahoma Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Given that the population of this place is less than 3,000, I would have thought it is more of a small town than a city. Is the figure given for population a typo? If not, why is Stroud classified as a city?

Oklahoma answer: The State of Oklahoma classifies municipally incorporated cities as "City" or "Town." Stroud is recognized by the state as a "City."

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Stroud, Oklahoma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721034521/http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_PL_GCTPL2.ST13&prodType=table to http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_PL_GCTPL2.ST13&prodType=table
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4182/is_19990524/ai_n10129472/
• Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121024013411/http://www.library.okstate.edu/okmaps/ to http://www.library.okstate.edu/okmaps/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, Thomas G. Andrews should not have been removed from the Notable persons section. He was a justice of the Oklahoma Supreme Court, which I understand qualifies him as notable. He also has a Wikipedia article Thomas G. Andrews (judge), so the original link was incorrectly linked, suggesting that there was no Wikipedia article about him. Bruin2 (talk) 18:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If he has an article then he meets WP:CITSTRUCT's criteria so can be included. I couldn't locate the article for him so under those guidelines he was removed. All is good now. Canterbury Tail talk 20:43, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]