Battle of Middle Boggy Depot

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Arkansas Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas (assessed as Low-importance).

Hey, I see that the article text was just edited to change the stated name of the NRHP / NHL listing, and to move the article. I believe the fact is that it is named "Camden Expedition Sites". One could possibly argue that the article name should be changed from that, but that would require some discussion and consensus. Offhand, I oppose the move, if there is not explanation. And, it is factually wrong to represent that the NRHP listing name is something else, so the NRHP infobox should continue to show the actual formal name.

Also, why is the image in the article removed? What is purpose of these edits? I will pause for some reply, but anticipate seeking reversal of recent changes. --doncram 02:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]