Fort Towson

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Beechcraft Bonanza V35 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Beechcraft Bonanza V35 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aviationwikiflight (talk) 13:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tucker Carlson Tonight you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tucker Carlson Tonight and Talk:Tucker Carlson Tonight/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 11:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tucker Carlson Tonight you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tucker Carlson Tonight for comments about the article, and Talk:Tucker Carlson Tonight/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 01:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Current Events Barnstar
		Thank you for the many articles you've created on current events. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 15:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey ElijahPepe. I wanted to let you know that Draft:Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip was created yesterday to not violate WP:FUTURE, given the Israeli ground invasion hasn't begun, or at least, not enough RS say it has begun. I saw you previously worked on the now redirect stub 2023 Israeli invasion of Gaza, so I wanted to suggest you could work on the draft-space article. Also, I wanted to note the stub-article title was wrong in general (Gaza Strip, not Gaza), plus it violated WP:FUTURE. So yeah, the draft-space article can be worked on and improved prior to the invasion, so when the invasion does occur, it is start/C class rather than a stub article. Cheers! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 04:48, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 31 § Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Removal of Sam Altman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Removal of Sam Altman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BangJan1999 18:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. This morning, when I was reading about the OpenAI drama that's going on, I suddenly wondered if someone would have been tempted to create an article about it. I then had a second thought: if they did, chances were that you would be the article creator. I logged onto Wikipedia, searched "firing of Sam Altman" (so close!), and indeed — there was an article created by you, and as I had guessed, it had been nominated for AfD. While your dedication to article creation is greatly appreciated, please consider slowing it down when it comes to creating articles about current events, which I know you are prolific in. Consider WP:NEVENT, WP:10YEAR, and especially WP:NOTNEWS. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:56, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with @InfiniteNexus. By coincidence, I came to this talk page to post the exact same concern. Removal of Sam Altman, and other articles such as Efforts to remove Kevin McCarthy are 1) clearly out of step with our best practices for naming and titles, which you should be aware of by now and 2) questionable in terms of notability, and would best be brought up on the relevant talk pages first as a proposal, rather than an abrupt fork. In the spirit of collaboration, please consider these points first before just starting a new article. It will save lots of grief and wasted time in requested move or Articles for Deletion debates. - Fuzheado | Talk 13:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Outline of investigations and court cases involving Donald Trump".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Rainbow Bridge explosion, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Rainbow Bridge explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ElijahPepe: Request deletion of this redirect as page "2024 New York's 3rd congressional district special election" is already up. Check your contributions! Type db-g7 inside {{}} in that redirect then save. Santiago Claudio (talk) 02:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was sad to see you reverted my redirect. I redirected it to the yearly article because a draft-article was already in the making (Draft:Tornado outbreak of December 9, 2023). I even explained that in the redirect message. I have now placed a PROD on the article and would like to ask if I may re-redirect the article and let the much better-shape draft replace it in the future. Basically, I also think an outbreak article is warrented, but the current draft-article was created first and is in a whole lot better shape than the stub you reverted back. Please, let me re-redirect it (cancelling the PROD) and let the better-shape draft get ready for mainspace. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the flow of information is greater in a separate article, there's nothing particularly disheartening about unredirecting it, and I mean zero ill-intentions. I read that you are honoring WP:0RR. At your discretion, you may redirect it again, as are alternative avenues; note that this is a developing situation that is garnering notability. You may also copy your content into the existing article. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and re-did the redirect. If I was the only editor, I would have just copied it in. However, seven other editors have edited the draft article, so I couldn't just copy/paste it over to mainspace without the article history being merged, which is a little bit of a hassle to do. Either way, I really thank you for letting me redirect it. It wasn't because I don't think it should be an article, just rather that several other editors had been working on this particular draft, so the 1-sentence mainspace article you made just complicated things a little bit. Once again, thank you! Feel free to help out on the draft: Draft:Tornado outbreak of December 9, 2023! Cheers! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If other editors are working on that draft in a significant manner, a history merge is likely necessary. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:50, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the courage to be free

Thank you for quality articles such as Tucker Carlson Tonight and The Courage to Be Free, for articles about current events such as Enyobeni Tavern disaster and Loretta Lynn, for copy-editing and "should be good now", - Elijah Pepe you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2899 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I've been putting together a task force for the show community and thought you might be intrested given your contributions to Jeff Winger Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ElijahPepe, we need experienced volunteers.

• New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
• If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
• If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's discussion board.
• Cheers, and hope to see you around.

Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Key & Peele sketch "Substitute Teacher" was analyzed for its racial commentary and educational insight? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 14,662 views (610.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apple Watch health monitoring patent dispute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apple Watch health monitoring patent dispute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lloyd Austin hospitalization controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd Austin hospitalization controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 21:18, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 23 § Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip until a consensus is reached. Elli (talk | contribs) 15:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 05:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) and Talk:Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 05:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) for comments about the article, and Talk:Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 07:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nytimes.com, January 2, 2024.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Soni. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The New York Times have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Soni (talk) 02:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Blanking out entire sections just because you don't agree with others is vandalism. Please do not do that. (I have not reverted you again out of respect for WP:3RR and similar policies, but the point stands regardless) Soni (talk) 02:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]