Fort Towson

Hi Adishere! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Sawantwadi taluka—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to BYJU'S. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Spolglans (talk) 04:54, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Byju Raveendran, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Byju Raveendran was changed by Adishere (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862397 on 2020-10-04T05:03:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:03, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Yashwantrao Bhonsale International School does not have any sources and citations to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Please see the school article guidelines which describes how the content of school articles should be organized, with the aim of providing general guidance to editors. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Steven (Editor) (talk) 23:37, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You had originally created this in the draftspace but then created it again in the mainspace — please don't this as it splits the page history. A submit button is now available in the draft for you to click on after you have finished working on it. It will then be reviewed and moved to mainspace if accepted. If declined, the reasons why will be provided to you which you can then address and resubmit. Steven (Editor) (talk) 23:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Zoodino was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Zoodino (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article List Of Chhota Bheem Characters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While well-meaning, this was an undiscussed article split that is also unjustified. Source article, Chhota Bheem was only about 22 kilobytes when this 8 kb was removed, so there was no justification based on article size to split this into a new article. See WP:SPLIT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:24, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://freshjobsonline.com/white-hat-jr-reviews/,. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:WhiteHat Jr. may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 23:32, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adishere. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Adishere. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Adishere|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 Praxidicae (talk) 17:12, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I am not a paid editor, I edit Wikipedia to make it better. Therefore, I am not a PAID EDITOR. Adishere (talk) 12:11, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Some of the text is a direct copyright violation of the sources. Most of the refs are clearly from press releases. Only one actually talks about the company and the reliability of that is very questionable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WhiteHat Jr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:WhiteHat Jr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   14:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Doraemon (Indian Version) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Persistently recreated under slightly different titles see here

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   15:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adishere! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Who are they?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero – Gayab Mode On it must go through AFC. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 14:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also do not move articles to draft space like this. You lack the experience to make these judgements, much less move 12 year old articles. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 14:06, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have a couple of further comments relating to your actions regarding the page mentioned by GRINCHIDICAE in the first of her two messages above.

1. You created the page which you subsequently placed at Hero- Gayab Mode On by copying and posting the content of another article, in order to change its title. That is not an acceptable way of changing the title of a page, as it loses the editing history, which must be kept, for copyright reasons. If there is a good reason to change the title of a page then it needs to be done by moving the existing page to the new title.
2. You created a page under the title Draft:Hero - Gayab Mode On, but then moved it to Hero- Gayab Mode On. While the difference in spacing in the title could have been accidental, it looks very much as though it may have been a deliberate method of avoiding the effect of protection against re-creation of Hero - Gayab Mode On. If so, please bear in mind that if an administrator has protected a title to prevent creation, then they no doubt have a reason for doing so. Don't try to get round that protection by creating the page under a slightly different title. Instead, if you think there is a legitimate reason why the block on creation should be lifted then consult the administrator who placed the protection. JBW (talk) 14:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adishere! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Who makes the page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I only made one edit to Tsurupika Hagemaru, and that was in good faith (I believed I was correct in doing so), so it is twice wrong that you stated that I should "Stop Vandalising the page again and again". David notMD (talk) 07:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adishere! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to Submit, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adishere! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, True Or False, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adishere! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Who Are You, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adishere! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to Change, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adishere! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Continuous Vandalism, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adishere. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 03:17, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adishere (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yes the user account Trialedit is created and used by me but I did that for a reason, That is if a day I forget my password and I want to edit something then only I would use it and for the same reason I use it, but I understood that it is not allowed on Wikipedia and I will not use that account as a sockspuppet, so kindly unblock me. Adishere (talk) 05:30, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This literally makes no sense. Why would you forget your password to only one account? Why would this be relevant anyway, as you could just create a new account if you forgot your password? And this doesn't explain why you used the other account to edit, in violation of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 11:53, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adishere (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

OK! I have understood my mistake and I promise I will never use any sock puppet account again. So I have understood my mistake and I will not do it again, I promise so kindly unblock me. Adishere (talk) 09:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It's not enough to say you understand, you must demonstrate your understanding by telling us what you did and what you will do going forward. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:45, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.