Fort Towson

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles United States Stub‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Stub This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I am sort of curious how the community feels about this being a page. Are textbooks worthy of articles? Anyway, I started a category called Textbooks, and added the other textbooks that I could find with articles. IF anyone happens to stumble onto this site (since I doubt anyone will search for it) leave a message about whether we should list it for deletion. Thanks.CharacterZero 05:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've not had any luck finding any other textbooks on here. However, I am leaving the category tag up there as a blazing reminder of this fact. I'm beginning to feel more like the article should be removed.CharacterZero 05:40, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ordinarily I'd agree, but given the newly-revealed controversy over it, I'm leaning towards keeping it. Farnsworth1968 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 18:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a source substantiating the statement that John DiIulio is a Democrat?

69.59.110.104 (talk) 23:33, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The sidebar says it was published in 2012. That can't be right, as the controversy section mentions 2008. I assume that's the date the fourth edition was published. A note, and the other date would be nice. Bno112300 (talk) 20:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]