Fort Towson

	This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 August 2020 and 5 September 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): EmilyBeeYT.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please update the section on Malta to discuss the referendum? A good source is here. I'd do it myself, but for some reason the article is protected. 75.154.73.203 (talk) 16:53, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if the reference to Article 26 of the Philippine Family Code is relevant or not; it's cited here as a contention that a marriage in the Philippines between an alien and a Filipino citizen can be ended for both parties if the alien obtains a divorce outside the Philippines.

The author quotes the second paragraph of Article 26. The first paragraph, however, begins by referring to the case in which an alien and a Filipino are married outside the Philippines, not in the Philippines. It's unclear from a layman's reading of the article whether the entire article applies only to marriages outside the Philippines or whether a Filipino married in the Phils and subsequently divorced by his/her alien spouse in another country is free to remarry. 183.97.59.157 (talk) 06:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is while the application of Philippine law is universal (hence, if two aliens are married in the Philippines, or two Filipinos are married outside the country, they'd be subjected to divorce laws in the country inasmuch as property rights and the like concerned), its application stops when it can't be enforced anymore. Therefore, if any couple had properties outside the Philippines, Philippine law can't be used to determine who gets what. –HTD 18:56, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I read somewhere that it was legal until it was prohibited by the Civil Code of the Philippines in 1950. –HTD 18:56, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article mentions that U.S. courts recognize two types of divorce, absolute divorce and limited divorce, but does not explain what these terms means. It would help if someone with more knowledge on the meaning of these two legal terms add an explanation of what each is. --50.247.125.19 (talk) 16:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Divorce law by country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040915201446/http://www.theglobeandmail.com:80/servlet/story/RTGAM.20040913.wdivor0913/BNStory/National/ to http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20040913.wdivor0913/BNStory/National/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Divorce law by country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070401063443/http://dsp-psd.communication.gc.ca:80/Pilot/LoPBdP/CIR/963-e.htm to http://dsp-psd.communication.gc.ca/Pilot/LoPBdP/CIR/963-e.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Divorce law by country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.islamonline.net/askaboutislam/display.asp?hquestionID=3202
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.agenciabrasil.gov.br/noticias/2007/01/26/materia.2007-01-26.3557347427/view
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070306214753/http://www.supremecourt.gov.ph:80/jurisprudence/2005/oct2005/154380.htm to http://www.supremecourt.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2005/oct2005/154380.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131213131149/http://www.algarveresident.com/0-42550/algarve/click.asp to http://www.algarveresident.com/0-42550/algarve/click.asp
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://bostonlawcollaborative.com/documents/2005-07-coaching-from-the-sidelines.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there are two very high-profile cases which are widely known to have been "for the money"; in the UK, the courts will basically award half the fortune to each party; both two of the world`s largest settlements have been awarded to foreigners/foreign residents by UK courts, HMRC having no remit at all.