This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Worcester was awarded a league "co-championship" in 2018 because the playoffs ran late due to weather. If you count a "co-championship" as ½, then Nashua has 4 and Worcester has 3½. If you count both "co-champions" as 1, then the two named clubs both have 4. You might also count "co-champion" as a fiction meriting nothing. I have provided this detail in the Infobox under "Most titles" and an anonymous Worcester fan has removed it. Please explain why the article is better without this clarification before editing it again. Spike-from-NH (talk) 00:48, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's too much for the Infobox, and it's unnecessary since it's explained in the body. -- Pemilligan (talk) 03:24, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
