Fort Towson

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Pennsylvania Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Metalworking Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Historic sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hopewell Furnace National Historic Site. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061014175034/http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/hh/8/hh8g.htm to http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/hh/8/hh8g.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:17, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All:

This is an explanation of several edits I made to the top of the Hopewell article:

The first paragraph contained "blast furnace" but linked to "bloomery;" this was changed to link to "blast furnace," since the site clearly contained a furnace and never a bloomery.

The modified first paragraph expands the list of noted structures to give a better overview of the significant restored structures of interest at the site.

The previous representative photo was of the anthracite furnace ruins. This is changed to the more representative photo of the overall furnace group. The AH was only present for a few years and was an economic failure, being dismantled, and is of little relevance to the overall site. In addition, the photo shows ruins, which misrepresents the majority of the site, which is restored. The AH ruins photo was moved to the gallery.

Comments are welcome. Brianschmult (talk) 12:46, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All:

I changed the founding date from 1771 to c. 1771, as there as no known evidence for an exact year, although Walker and Robinson Associates conclude "about" or "probably" 1771. The date range is constrained by the apparent land purchase in 1769 and the oldest known product with a cast-in date of 1772.

I made several edits to the References and External Links sections. First, there were 2 EL sections, without an apparent reason, and in conflict with the MOS statement that all section names should be unique within an article. I merged the two. Second, there were two links (Refs and EL) to the same NPS Administrative History document; I removed the one in EL. Finally, I changed the caption for this document to its actual title. These sections may need more work, particularly for the addition of Walker, I'm thinking about it.

Brianschmult (talk) 13:36, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All:

I have redone the photo gallery, replacing most, but not all, of the previous photos. I left the old links as comments as a reference to what was there.

The principle is to show a single representative photo of the most important structures, based on the function of the place (smelting), while trying to minimize the number of photos, consistent with the MOS, which discourages excessive galleries, especially with photos high in proportion to text, and the article is currently light on text.

The first (village) photo was replaced for being long on grass and fence, and short on structures.

The reasons for the removals are as follows:

1. Anthracite - not very relevant to site, only operating a few years.
2. Piano - Too narrow a topic, especially with nothing about the mansion.
3. Coal wagon - too narrow a topic.
4. Plates stacked up: rather non-descript compared to stove, plus unclear that all are actually HF products or reproductions.
5. Race/wheel house - not a significant structure compared to others.
6. Dam - Better on significance, but perhaps run out of space. Restore in future depending on layout, text ratio, etc.

Brianschmult (talk) 00:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]