Fort Towson

	This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

In the article what is the difference between "orthodox" and "conservative"? 75.35.145.226 04:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article classifies as liberal a number of denominations that I think are more properly classified as mainline. (Mainline churches accommodate liberal Christianity, but also have moderate and conservative wings, i.e. they accommodate a broad range of opinion.) If no one objects, I'll switch the references from "liberal" to "mainline". Adam_sk (talk) 07:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed the "liberal" descriptor of various groups is still used. Mainline would be the more appropriate for several of these groups. Moreover, some of these are wrong. I think the author's use of of orthodox, conservative, liberal, evangelical, etc. are quite subjective and need to be under review. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.134.31.51 (talk) 04:01, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I beg your pardon, but I think I detect a tinge of embarrassment, or at least confusion, from the use of the term "liberal". It is just that, a term. It defines and delineates certain core values and beliefs from others. Yes, of course these terms are subjective in the sense that one is trying to place an entire standard of belief into one word, an identifier. To switch any word to "mainline" would be inaccurate because one then presupposes to speak for the "main", i.e. "most people", when there probably is no one dominant point-of-view in the main. It is also intellectually disingenuous, since it would seem to do away with those differences and divisions that indeed do exist, based upon simply how we feel or what we think we know. Either liberal or conservative or somewhere in between, one should not be embarrassed by a word that only quickly identifies one's school of thought. If one assumes something about an individual person or group based almost purely on a term, then that is demonstrated prejudice, of course. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.88.24.58 (talk) 14:22, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Reformed denominations in North America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141111183209/http://www.tateville.com/churches.html to http://www.tateville.com/churches.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]