Fort Towson

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: Passenger trains Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force. It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

is this an actual physical train, or a train route that may be operated by different engines & carriages?

A train route. Chazzoz 00:56, Sep 2, 2004 (UTC)

Really takes two hours to cross the U.S./Canada border!? Damn!

They have to check the ID and search the baggage of every passenger. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plasma east (talk • contribs)

They check documentation, but they do not search everyone's baggage. dcandeto (talk) 13:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That bit of time would pass quite nicely sleepin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.78.218.60 (talk) 07:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This should probably be renamed to Maple Leaf (passenger train), should it not?Plasma east (talk) 11:55, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it shouldn't have, since whole different Maple Leaf existed once. ----DanTD (talk) 21:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is anyone else having a problem where the route map, when shown, hangs out and over the table of station stops? If "Adirondack and Ethan Allen Express to Montreal and Rutland" had a carriage return in it it'd be a lot better, but as it is it's pretty distracting for me. Am I the only one who's experiencing this? GTD Aquitaine (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This now looks a little better. Not perfect - but better. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 01:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the recent additions are inappropriate--aside from the name, the Lehigh Valley's train used a completely different route between New York and Buffalo. Far from being a reintroduction, it's a new service which used an obvious name, one used by several other trains. Note the Amtrak route guide, which gives more weight to the old Grand Trunk train. Mackensen (talk) 16:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]