GA Review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Bruce Campbell (talk) 22:25, 23 February 2011 (UTC) 12:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Summary: Overall, very impressive article, though I believe it could use an additional picture or two, but that isn't detrimental to any degree. It deserves to be passed. Bruce Campbell (talk) 22:25, 23 February 2011 (UTC)