Fort Towson

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Michigan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I perfectly understood the logic of the first revert, but the second revert is ill-considered. Using Internal links to sections of other articles is useful and entirely proper is to make it easier for readers to cross-link relevant information.[1] The reverted link was to a well-referenced section in the J.W. Knapp Company article discussing in detail the J.W. Knapp Company Building.

If you'd rather have a separate article on the building, you are welcome to spin off that section into a new article. Be my guest. But to revert an internal link with an imperious pronouncement "We write articles on individual buildings..." is more than a bit over the top.Fladrif (talk) 20:39, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely agree with Fladrif here. There are plenty of other examples where NRHP lists link to sections of related articles. NYT ... what's your objection to this? --sanfranman59 (talk) 01:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]