Fort Towson

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Death Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York (state) Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is a badly written article. The section of the NY State constitution cited by the article doesn't appear to bear any relevance to the court decision.

The article needs to more fully explain how and why (or at least quote the language of the court's decision) the trial court violated the Constitutional provision so cited.

In short this article is a mess.

PainMan (talk) 01:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Preposterous. Every claim in this article is duly sourced, with the bulk of it coming from the court transcript of the decision. If the language is not clear to you, then perhaps it needs rewriting, but there are no claims made anywhere that "lack citations." I will continue to remove this tag until an administrator places it there, though I doubt one will decide to do as such, because this article does NOT lack cited sources. - Sestet (talk) 03:48, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is practically no inline sources, i would support the point of view that this article is unsourced based on that fact.--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 14:31, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is what the article appears to state at the momment, are we sure these details are correct and not suppose to be the other way round?--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 23:03, 16 December 2008 (UTC) I was wondering the same thing. a little googling tells me it was rape first, murder second. (of course my brain told me that before, but i had to check...)Jimifloydrix (talk) 04:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on People v. LaValle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150908211113/http://www.courts.state.ny.us/ctapps/decisions/jun04/71opn04.pdf to http://www.courts.state.ny.us/ctapps/decisions/jun04/71opn04.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]