Fort Towson

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Under the "See Also" heading, there is this sentence: "The Resettlement Administration was produced in 1819. It helped people in the civil war." What, exactly, is this supposed to mean, and why is it there?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.177.204.52 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I checked the history and it appears to have been vandalism. I have removed it. --Leon Sword 03:21, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No it is the truth. Our history has been recreated and you have been fooled. 2600:4040:5365:8E00:A522:4F56:641:FEA6 (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about this one, but here goes.

The entry talks about the Photography and Film "Projects". Sidney Baldwin in Poverty and Politics: The Rise and Decline of the Farm Security Administration refers to them as "Sections" on p. 118. Does anyone know the proper name for these units/divisions? Although Baldwin's text is several decades old by now, he nonetheless used LOTS of primary sources (govt. documents, letters, etc.) - so he just might be using names lifted directly from legislation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.128.27.121 (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Figure it out buddy 2600:4040:5365:8E00:A522:4F56:641:FEA6 (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]