Fort Towson

	U.S. Route 75 in Iowa has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 15, 2016 Good article nominee Listed January 21, 2018 WikiProject A-class review Approved
Current status: Good article

This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: U.S. Highways / Iowa Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics  U.S. Highways   Locations  Iowa   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Wikipedians in Iowa may be able to help! Article recognition:   This article was the selected article of the U.S. Roads Portal in April 2018. United States: Iowa Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Low-importance).

This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. Route 75 in Iowa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 13:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this one over the next few days. --Coemgenus (talk) 13:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

Images

• Both are fine.

U.S. Highway origins

• "Support for the system was unanimous in Iowa..." Unanimous? That's a bold claim.
• That's my only comment, really. This is well-written and nearly ready for promotion. --Coemgenus (talk) 12:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The unanimous claim comes from page 5 of the Service Bulletin which is Ref 1. Unfortunately, it's offline, but I have a scan of it, so I will type out the relevant paragraph:

"Approval of the U.S. system by the states has been practically unanimous. At the recent poll of the states on the question of final adoption [of the creation of the U.S. Highway System] there was but one dissenting vote coming from an eastern state and this on the ground that that state had not been given a mileage proportional to the amount of traffic on its heavy routes, between large population centers.

• The square brackets enclose my comment that tries to add context. If you like, I could change it to "Support for the system was unanimous among Iowa transportation officials..." since that was really the who referred to in that paragraph. I'm glad you liked the article. –Fredddie™ 21:52, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Sure, that would clear things up a bit. I'll promote the article now, just make that correction when you get a change. Nice work! --Coemgenus (talk) 11:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]