Fort Towson

Hi, Виктор Не Вацко, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.

However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.

Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 17:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ترجمة | թարգմանություն | tərcümə | пераклад | অনুবাদ | превод | 翻译 | თარგმანი | μετάφραση | અનુવાદ | תרגום | अनुवाद | 翻訳 | ಅನುವಾದ | 번역 | ການແປພາສາ| превод | भाषांतर करणे | ترجمه | перевод | превод | மொழிபெயர்ப்பு | అనువాద |ترجمہ การแปล | переклад | dịch | יבערזעצונג

Kicker changed its results in a top 40 all-time ranking called Die legendären Weltklubs published in March 2014. Also, it was not the only magazine to have med these kind of publications.--Danteilperuaviano (talk) 23:11, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Heavyweight into Longest reigning heavyweight boxing champions. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Виктор Не Вацко. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Óscar Tabárez, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brian Clough, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please start a new article for stats like this. The list is for current world boxing champions. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:35, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Floyd Mayweather, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Lindenfall (talk) 15:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced information. Read Wikipedia:Citing sources. Lindenfall (talk) 15:54, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The information references to articles that are sourced. No need to duplicate it. Виктор Не Вацко 18:03, 7 September 2018 (UTC+2)

Hello, Виктор Не Вацко. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Виктор Не Вацко. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Valeriy Lobanovskyi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canada national football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Valeriy Lobanovskyi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spartak Moscow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Д.Д. Вікторе, вибачте, що турбую. Мені тут дехто написав, що бачив у англійській Вікіпедії сторінки "Українського футболу", прикріплені в ПДФ до статей. Коротше кажучи, газети вже немає, але в мене можуть бути проблеми через авторські права -- мовляв, я не мав права давати комусь ПДФ-ки. Якщо можете, повидаляйте їх. Я спробував зробити це в статті про Ярі Літманена, але в мене не вийшло. Дякую за розуміння. Хорошого дня.--Volodymyr VB (talk) 06:31, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Не можу згадати Ваш і-мейл...--Volodymyr VB (talk) 06:31, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you a lot for helping, but please don't edit material placed in my personal space. -- IvanchukW (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC+2)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Super middleweight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Lemieux.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Please do not ignore this discussion about your edits. No doubt you'll revert again, but it won't look on you as you've had no support for your edits. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How is this notable in an already VERY cramped lead section? It belongs in a Legacy and historical standing section. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it not notable? I mean, this way we can remove anything from the lead section of any fighter's article. Not only Vitali Klitschko, but also Muhammad Ali, Joe Louis, Floyd Mayweather, Manny Pacquiao etc. And simply keep "he is/was a professional boxer, he is a former/current world champion". It is pretty notable, there is a very small selection of fighters to reach such number in the heavyweight division. So if you want to remove such information from the lead section, you shall apply this on any boxer's article. Виктор Не Вацко 19:17, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, OK, 15 fighters.. not all that impressive when several of them were scrubs like Kirk Johnson, Kevin Johnson, Sosnowski, and Charr. Making ten defences is a more impressive stat. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Scrubs" or not, it does not matter. 15 fighters is still an impressive number. And well, he made those ten defenses against "scrubs" like Kevin Johnson, Sosnowski, and Charr, so by this logic, it is not an impressive stat either. P.S. I don't think his fight against Kirk Johnson was a title fight (but I see the point you're trying to make). Виктор Не Вацко 18:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Joe Louis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 00:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There is a discussion about the lead paragraph of the article. Do you want to share your opinion?--Jahalive (talk) 18:22, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd like to, thanks. -- Виктор Не Вацко 8:38, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ruslan Chagaev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Showtime.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Have you read WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle? It's usually the best thing to do when an edit of yours gets reverted and you don't agree. --Jahalive (talk) 19:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Renat 21:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Виктор Не Вацко! I don’t suppose you could add the numbers for the Chisora-Parker PPV by any chance? 94.173.243.187 (talk) 11:49, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Виктор Не Вацко! I was wondering if you could add the numbers for the Fury-Chisora PPV possibly? LRQ 98 (talk) 09:25, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LRQ 98 Hi, unfortunately BT Sport never publicly releases their PPV numbers anywhere, the best thing I can do is to add Frank Warren's statement about 500k buys. Виктор Не Вацко (talk) 12:47, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Football Coach of the Season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Football Coach of the Season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mitte27 (talk) 17:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Football Coach of the Year is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Football Coach of the Year until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mitte27 (talk) 17:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Template:European Coach of the Year, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Govvy (talk) 09:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Govvy (talk) 09:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as European Football Coach of the Year, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as European Football Coach of the Season, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]