|
|||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Maus revert
User talk:Poeticbent/Archive 13#Maus revert
Good article reassessment for Kraków
Kraków has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Teilhard de Chardin(1).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Teilhard de Chardin(1).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The file File:Blank Pages by GC Malcher (book cover).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free book cover being used in a WP:DECORATIVE manner in the main infobox of George Malcher. Non-freebook covers are generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about the books they represent, but their use in other articles or in other ways is generally only allowed when the book cover itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There's no such commentary for this particular book cover anywhere in the article (the book is mentioned by name twice), and there's no need for a "visual identification" of Malcher's publsihing achievement per WP:FREER (as the non-free use rationale is claiming) since those achievements can be more that suffciently understood by reliably sourced text alone.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)