Battle of Backbone Mountain

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: Streetcars Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars. United States: Colorado Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the New section tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/eaglepcommuterrailpr/

  Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 11:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 22:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A Line (RTD). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/61dE4pl46?url=http://denverinfill.com/blog/2010/07/east-corridor-groundbreaking.html to http://denverinfill.com/blog/2010/07/east-corridor-groundbreaking.html
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/61dDvBaJE?url=http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/eaglepcommuterrailpr/ to http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/eaglepcommuterrailpr/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article says clearly that the line is officially called the University of Colorado line for sponsorship reasons. In the interests of those unfamiliar with why the line is named as it is -- visitors and most residents -- the article should also say clearly that the train does not go to the University of Colorado. The title of the article reflects this and is appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.253.168.62 (talk • contribs) 16:45, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, didn't notice you commented here. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Having a logo .svg file at the top of the infobox that has an obvious typo in the word "Colorado" looks incredibly amateurish and the logo should not be readded to the page until it's corrected. I would do it myself but I don't have the image-editing skills. I've put a notice on the wikimedia commons page of the user who created the image but until it's fixed please don't re-add it to the page. --Jfruh (talk) 17:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and even without the typo, the logo does not appear to me to be a faithful reproduction of the logo, at least not as it appears on the A-Line home page. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 18:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The "Route" section of this article seems somewhat wordy. Would it make sense for me or another editor to rewrite it in a more consice manner? FoamingInDenver (talk) 21:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]